The argument I am presenting today is in favor of Mr. Bakke and the economic growth that will be prevented if he is unable to attend medical school. Mr. Bakke being rejected from attending the University of California, Davis Medical School twice is a violation of his civil rights. His rights should be protected under the 14th amendment. However, it was instead a direct violation of his civil rights inciting that with the violation of the 14th amendment to attend the institution. It also inhibits his economic growth since he is unable to attend medical school. It affects his economic growth due to not gaining income. This prevents him from making money to help grow the economy and also from a personal perspective his lack of income will leave him poor and destitute.
Mr. Bakke has applied to the medical school in California twice in hopes of advancing his career. However, that was unable to be accomplished due to the fact that he was rejected to give space to minorities which will grow their economic standing. Leaving Mr. Bakke to fall behind due to the fact that he was rejected. The rejection is preventing the personal economic growth he would have if he was able to attend medical school. He is now suffering from a lack of personal prosperity that was taken away by the minorities who received admission into the institution.
Further research shows that Mr. Bakke received better test scores and had a higher-grade point average as opposed to the other candidates that applied that were minorities. Denying him admission will only harm his potential economic growth since he is unable to attend medical school. In closing, the evidence above shows that Mr. Bakke will have to struggle for the rest of his life and be behind in his economic status due to his rejection from the Californian Medical School.
Sources
Bakke decision | law case | Britannica
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke | Oyez
No comments:
Post a Comment